While imported ingredients remain high on the awareness of pet owners across the United States and Canada, there is something here in the U.S. that few are aware and is a similar threat to our pets Terms FDA SRM ingredients -. specified risk materials. SRM is a common ingredient in food for pets is a bit more waste from the meat industry of man The only name -. specified risk material – says concern.
To begin, you must understand that the food industry pet started doing the same thing as pet owners used to do … feeding their dogs and cats leftovers from family meals. Companies saw an opportunity with the help of remnants of the manufacture and processing of human food and animal feed business was born when the remains of your family meals do not seem too dangerous for animals Company -. remnants of the business side can be very different Interestingly, back in the 1960s, food for pets has launched a national campaign to alert pet owners. “dangers” in feeding your dog or cat remains – even themselves have done and continue to do the same on a commercial level.
A common concern discussed by those who know about food for pets is known ingredients 4-D. The 4-D are dead, diseased, drugged, and shot the animal meat producers. These animals 4-D are rejected for use in food for obvious reasons. Common sense would lead one to assume the animals are destroyed, but this is not the case. 4-D animals are processed for use in foods for pets and are part of the risks specified by the FDA Materials.
Another concern of SRM from a more modern day risk of mad cow disease – BSE – “.. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) is a chronic, degenerative disease affecting the central nervous system of cattle” encephalopathy Bovine spongiform definition of FDA’s BSE For more information, visit the web page of FDA’s BSE http://www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/bse.html. FDA to give credit, they have strengthened their control in recent years a large and does not allow MRS to be introduced into the human food chain by prohibiting SRMs possible in the feeding of cattle, sheep or pigs -. But these ruminant SRMs are permitted in food for pets BSE or mad cow disease has crossed species of cats. in Europe, mink in the world, and deer and elk in the United States. (For more information visit http://w3.aces.uiuc.edu/AnSci/BSE/ BSE) I am the first to admit that the risk of mad cow disease entering the population of pets in U.S. is a long shot, but there is a risk of concern.
To give you some startling figures explaining how specified risk material is processed, I will read a letter from Garth Merrick to the FDA … “Federal Measures to reduce the risk of BSE: Considerations for further action.” … (Letter is available here: https: / / web01.aphis.usda.gov/regpublic.nsf/168556f5aa7a82ba85256ed00044eb
1f/b5773ca9a76035d487256edf00540410/Body/M2? OpenElement)
“SRM from cattle under 30 months of age were estimated at £ 20 per head. In Texas, there are four packing houses processing approximately 100,000 head per week times 20 pounds equals 2,000,000 times 52 weeks equals 104,000,000 of product that no one has discussed what to do with. Also, in Texas, there are about 18,000 head of cattle over 30 months slaughtered per week to four processing plants that are about 60 pounds per head of SRM is equal to 1,080,000 per week is £ 56,160,000 per year. Our company services primarily in Texas and parts of New Mexico, Oklahoma and Kansas. Last year we processed 255,000 head of cattle died without counting calves with an average weight of 600 pounds per carcass. The total weight amounts to 153,000.000 pounds that makes its way into feed ingredients. “
The 4-D material discussed above – a business – processed 153 million pounds of dead cattle in one year. I repeat – 153 million pounds to treat animals died within a year of business! There are no tests to determine why the animal died -… Causes could run from the old to the disease, we do not know the current FDA and AAFCO regulations allow dead animals (4-D) to be turned into pet food, they are not allowed to be processed in human food chain, either directly or indirectly (through the use of cattle or pig feed). The 104 million and 56 million more pounds of SRMs generated by this one company in one year is also permitted in pet food, but can not be processed for human food, either directly or in-directly the current decision FDA’s treatment of SRM -. Effective 01/09/2007 – does not protect pet food. http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/E6-16830.htm
Mr Merricks letter to the FDA does raise a valid point that what should meat processors do with those millions and millions of pounds of SRM? I did not answer this question. But I can tell you that I do not want to SRM in a bowl of food my pet. This is not my responsibility to find a selling point for SRM.
Besides the pet owners who are aware of SRM in feed for pets and a handful of qualified veterinarians, there are national organizations that feel SRM must be removed from the diet for pets as well. From December 2005 Letter from the American Farm Bureau Federation to the FDA … (Http://google2.fda.gov/search?client=FDA&site=FDA&lr=&proxystyles
heet = FDA & output = xml_no_dtd & getfields =* & q = what + is +4 D + animals
+ + + In animal food and as = GO) …
“Our members recognize the importance and strongly support the ban on feeding ruminants to ruminants, which came into force in August 1997. Given what is currently known about the epidemiology and characteristic long period of incubation of BSE, we agree that it is appropriate for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to implement additional measures that will reduce the risk of BSE recycling in cattle herd States USA. Specifically, we support the extension to all cattle, poultry and pet foods the current ban on ruminant brain and spinal cord from cattle 30 months or more. “
If the FDA does not extend the prohibition of SRMs to include pet food, at least the food label pet must indicate their presence in foods. Currently, you will not find listed on an SRM dog food or cat food label. Pet food manufacturers were not born yesterday. I doubt that many sales would occur from the words specified risk material listed on a dog food or cat food label. RS came in food ingredients pet-products (meat byproducts, poultry by-products, flour by-products, and so on) If you’re comfortable with your pet to eat specified risk material. – I suggest you do not eat any food for pets or to deal with by-products listed in the ingredients
!
SRM in feed for pets is frightening to contemplate. An estimate of the economic impact of the destruction of SRM instead of recycling of SRM in feed for pets has been estimated at 15 million per year. Given the 56.4 million pet-owning households in the United States spend more than $ 40 billion per year on their pets, I say it is money well spent.
We wish you and your pet the best,
Susan Thixton
Susan Thixton has worked in the pet industry for over 20 years. She runs a pet food awareness website publishing articles and a newsletter to educate pet owners worldwide. For more information visit www.TruthAboutPetFood.com